find more documents from this course "Rational Decision Making"

SS 18 Lösungsvorschlag.pdf

Exams
Uploaded by Anonymous User at 2018-12-07
Description:

Zum Vergleich der Lösungen. Keine Gewähr

 0
49
4
Download
Could somebody explain this in more detail please?
-the probability of the PA being guilty given that CFO fingerprints were found is 0 - so, this means that PA being NOT guilty and CFO fingerprints were found is equal= 1 - 0 = 1 , thus CFO fingerprints were found
thx :-)
Wo finde ich in der Vorlesung was dazu?
tutorial 5 q&a slides am ende
Da soll man doch p(CEO/cfo) berechnen oder nicht? Ergo ca 22%
richtig, man geht davon aus, dass die Fingerabdrücke vom CFO gefunden wurden
No area was marked for this question
Bei 3b) p(PA,pa) muss es 0,16 sein
WHAT'S UP WITH THATKARMA?
Do something good for the community! Answer questions, give votes, share helpful documents and you'll see: If you do good, good will be done to you. If now or in the future... you'll find out.