Complex Cognition

at Maastricht University

Join course
No area was marked for this question
These the only ones relevant to the exam? :)
View 4 more comments
"The list is not complete" I love this guy.
No area was marked for this question
Really great work !! Thx :) Do u know why he skipted Topic 8 ?
View 2 more comments
YOURE so cool stay hydrated kids - literally love you so much
thank you so much!!
No area was marked for this question
nice but quite inaccurate... for some things it's good to look at this tho. Thank you! Maybe for the ppl reading this i'd advice to not take everything into account... most of competing theories are wrong and definition as well... plus weak connections or not at all for similar theories
View 11 more comments
You guys can't handle any criticism? I agree with the jester, I think this document is full of mistakes. in herco's annotated concept map, he says ancient history/greeks gets you less or NO points. By pointing out this is not accurate, jaster is actually helping you. And uf he chooses to not share his stuff thats his decision. You sound like a bunch of children. Get out of your sugar coated world!
nobody asked for any material here Julius! And holding back mine is just my own choice (plus I worked hard for my own connections, you could have done the same and get your shit together). Anyways, my decision of not sharing doesn't give you any right to personally insult me. and it just shows how little you are. Furthermore, I was pointing out, as faceplate said ,that there are lots of errors in the map and maybe it's not a great idea to base your studying on that ! Cheers and good luck!
sorry for the shit handwriting also here is a link to evidence for the linda thing (Dual Systems by Kahneman):
View 3 more comments
When I saw that PDF, this kendrick lamar lyrics kicked in : Who need a hero? (hero) You need a hero, look in the mirror, there go your hero
No area was marked for this question
thank you so much
No area was marked for this question
you´re awesome! thank youuuu so so much
No area was marked for this question
Will you also upload your concept maps? That would be really nice!
View 7 more comments
Apparentaly I asked a stupide question?☹️
No area was marked for this question
I just wanted to let you know that this doesn't include all important theories the course coordinator mentioned and at the same time includes some that were not mentioned, just so you know !
Your remarks are the only thing that keep me alive atm, Thank you
Is this true?
View 1 more comment
@stay hydated love your humour!:D
Plead that fifth bitch
Does someone maybe know what the open question could be? (Maybe from third year students)
Nobody ? ?
Last year you had to choose a cross cultural research article from any of the tasks and come up with a question about cultural differences yourself...and then you had to answer your own question (in 50 to 100 words if i remember correctly)
No area was marked for this question
View 2 more comments
does anybody know if it's the tasks 2-4-5-6 and 7 are the only ones important for this year as well? Does herco say it somewhere?
he said 2-6
can someone upload their lecture notes
No area was marked for this question
I want to give you chocholate for your great work :) or booze
i’m so game ??
guys difference between similar theories and opposing? Anything else I need to know about kinds of theories? Thank you
No area was marked for this question
That was one of the best summaries I have ever read on this platform, thank you so much! Keep going please
No area was marked for this question
Its Task 6 in 2018, Articles are up to date.
Hey there ! One question to those, who passed complex cognition - what would be important to focus on? Articles, Keywords? Lectures? Thanks :)
Everything ahah I would say that last year, MCQs shared by the students were too deep so they were not taken for the exam. Otherwise pay attention to the concept maps: theory is a theory, not hypothesis or bias/fallacy/heuristic :)
definitely key words. you don't need to know all the articles! it's important for you to be able to understand the keywords and relating concepts and also how these keywords connect with each other
No area was marked for this question
Will you also upload the summaries for task 3 and 4?
yeah ill do it as soon as i have properly read the literature oops, but it'll be up eventually hehe
Thanks ????
“prechoice” oops i’m blind
Really nice summary!
Yes, thanks a lot! :)
Does anyone have a summary of the article: Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70-99 before monday? Thank you in advance.
Where did you read up on this?
No area was marked for this question
Hey! :) do you have summaries for the other tasks as well? :)
No area was marked for this question
Is there anyone who still has a document with all the group generated questions?
I posted the document 2 days ago :) (but I didn't mention the references because only few mentioned it)
How specific do you guys refer to the 2 articles in the individual report from the virtual mobility assignment? I still have no clue on what I should write for this... I can only come up with really general/basic things.
I compared their results with my experience and I mentioned them in a reference list :)
I referred to them content-wise but didn't really care much about more.
Is the middle part of the concept map (name of theory/explanation) always filled in on the exam?
Nope :) he can write a competing theory or a weakness and you have to find the central theory/model/approach/hypothesis/little potato/pineapple :)
No area was marked for this question Interesting topic.. dual-process and dual-system are similar, some people say that DPM is from Kahneman, others say it's from Greene...not so clear :(
No area was marked for this question
Man, just wanted to tell you how much i appreciate your notes ! They are some quality shit and you saved my ass!
I am a bit lost concerning the concept maps for Task 5 "reasoning" what would be a history aspect for the "mental logic theories" and "mental model theory"? because for the heuristic-analytic model one could mention William James with the first dual-process model
View 1 more comment
He answered this question on the discussion board: Mail with added numbers to make answering easier: "I am sorry to bother you with this again but a lot of students are having big problems with approaching the concept maps. 1 There are a lot of theories where people would consider doing a concept map, but there are simply points missing, for example for a lot of theories there is no history mentioned or no empirical support. Do we leave these theories out or are we supposed to go into deeper individual research to find answers to those parts, that weren't covered in the literature? 2 Also it is hard for us to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant concepts, for example are concepts like deductive reasoning, gestalt approach or insight relevant or is that not what you intended? 3 Due to the fact that we did not have any tutors this course and have not received a deeper explanation of how to approach these or what topics we are supposed to focus on, many of us are clueluess and spend alot of time on guessing what might come up in the exam. 4 Also, because you mentioned that 1 or two of the fields will be filled out, many of us are worried that if we do not know what is meant with the two fields we w ill not be able to complete the concept map. 5 If you fill out the fields, do you have specific answers in mind or will you accept whatever makes sense or might not be directly related but is otherwise accurate?" 1 This is why you typically are not required to fill out all open fields. Only when I think it is fair given what you can get from textbooks will I ask for full maps 2 deductive reasoning and insight are concepts that refer to cognitive phenomena or processes. They are not theories of models or h theory of deductive reasoning would be OK, but then refer to the name of the theory of the author (like mental model theory, or the theory of Johnson Laird, or mental model theory of Johnson-Laird) 3 Absence of tutors is irrelevant. In previous years, concept maps were not discussed in tutorial groups. Tutors were explicitly told not to discuss them because they might pass on wrong information or evaluations. Last year, without tutors, the maps were completed better than ever before. (Have you considered you may be lucky that there are no tutors who interfere?) 4 Yes, that would be a case of bad luck, but I think it rarely happened to students who were awake during tutorial group sessions 5 No, anything goes, as long as it is correct and fits well with the content of the other fields in the map
thank you for the answer
No area was marked for this question
Thanks a lot !! just wanted to know what is FTF and CMC ?
FTF is face-to-face communication, and CMC as far as I understood it is a kind of virtual communication program
CMC just means computer-mediated communication I think
Herco's announcement basically means that the last question is gonna be about the articles we have to read for our report? "As was communicated earlier, students who have taken the psy2021/ipn2021 course/exam before, are allowed to skip the last open question in Thursday's exam. However, this makes 50% of their grade depend on only three questions (concept maps). In addition, the fourth question has been adapted so the disadvantage of not having been involved in the practical is minimal. My guess is that they would benefit from answering the last question. Therefore, it will be up to them to decide if they do or do not answer the last question. NB This option is only available for students who have registered for the course and exam in 2016 or earlier. When in doubt, you can send me an e-mail."
Can somebody tell me whether there is a mistake in the TV series Sherlock Holmes? Sherlock once talked about the website he had which is called "the science of deduction". However, visiting the crime scene and trying to form a conclusion from several cues sounds more like probabilistic reasoning, which is described as inductive reasoning.
maybe because you have an indicator or smth which is quite general (e.g. a book) but then sherlock deduces from that general book to the specific thing that this book shows something? i don't know
Hi people :) does anyone has a summery about the 3rd, 4th and 5th lecture and would be so kind and upload it?
View 1 more comment
thank you very much, that's totally fine! :)
You're welcome :)
Would someone mind to upload a summary for the two articles we have to read for the essay we need to write about the CoCo Practical?
I just uploaded one ;)
Here is a typo: 'Hypothesis 2: Consumers primed on interdependence will be more likely to take financial risks than will those primed on INDEPENDENCE.' (not interdependence)
No area was marked for this question
what literatture did u use?
This is the title.. Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124-1137.
Yeah, Loriiih is right - it's listed in the "other materials"-part in the course manual
No area was marked for this question
way better tah the other summary! thank you